| Click on any Page to ENLARGE Original and/or Find Text version Below |
| Index 1 |
| Previous |
| Next |
|
|
| Page 1/2 |
| Page 2/2 |
| Copyright © 2009-2013, MARC CAMPUS |
August 23, 2007
Office of the Legal Affairs of FINAL NOTICE
Secretariat-general of Interpol
AR#1A 000 186 5231 4
Re: Final demand regarding the Liabilities and Responsibilities of the Office of Legal Affairs
of Secretariat-general of Interpol
Dear Sir :
This letter is written in response to your clear inaction, which, considering the circumstances surrounding this incident, the
damage to Marc Campus’s reputation and the damage to Marc Campus’s business activities, and, is still inexcusable. We
respectfully reject your explanation that Interpol’s General Secretariat cannot be responsible for information recorded in
national databases or for information already deleted from Interpol’s databases. We stress Interpol’s General Secretariat
responsibility for information processed between Interpol’s members inside of the organization’s structure and request that
you tender an advance partial payment to start the repair process.
As you know, Marc Campus was cleared of all charges on appeal in 1985. And still the inaccurate information was
disclosed to outside agencies in 1991, 1996, 1998 and 2006. This information was forwarded initially from your
organization network 6 years after the case was dismissed. As a direct result of this false disclosure, Marc Campus had
new business agreements destroyed which cost him and his companies millions of dollars in loss.
Since then, Marc has repeatedly requested that this information be corrected through several documented telephone calls
and correspondence with your organization. Marc has been repeatedly told by your office that it is someone else’s fault.
However, in 2006, Marc was told by a legal US adviser at the USNCB that it is up to Interpol France to disclose proper
information.
Apparently, Interpol would prefer to dispute Marc’s claims and damages in front of a United States jury, while trying to
explain why your office should not be held accountable. We welcome this opportunity. We are confident that we will not only
obtain an enormous verdict, but we will have a jury verdict for a generous amount of punitive damages as well.
In view of the clear liability, the nature of the damages sustained by Marc Campus, the damages he received to his
reputation, the huge damages he received from failed business endeavors and the suffering he continues to experience
today due to the unnecessary delay in getting this matter resolved, we are confident that after reviewing all of the evidence
submitted, Marc would receive judgment in excess of any monetary amount you may offer now.
I would like to point out to you that your organization actions of reporting blatantly wrong information through official
channels from Interpol France to USNCB, to other NCB’s and from there to other governmental agencies around the world
6 years after the case was dismissed not only impinges on Marc’s personal freedom but is fraudulent and slanderous as
well. Interpol’s General Secretariat is clearly liable for the defamatory information that was processed between Interpol
members through the Interpol network. Interpol’s General Secretariat is liable for the defamatory information reported when
it was ordered to delete the conviction from its files and provide all other governmental entities the accurate information.
And, Interpol’s General Secretariat is liable for the unnecessary procrastination in getting this matter resolved.
Furthermore, it is further my opinion that if you refuse to take immediate action to complete the necessary steps to insure
the inaccurate information is deleted from USNCB, from all NCB’s and from other law agencies around the world and make
an advance partial payment to start the repair process, but rather expose other law agencies to liability as well, you will have
again breached your duty of good faith to Marc Campus and other governmental agencies for failure to mitigate damages
and correct your own wrongs immediately when given the opportunity to do so.
We will hold this opportunity open until September 15, 2007. If no action is taken by said date, it will be withdrawn and we
will file a lawsuit in the United States Federal Court and will proceed into litigation. I would appreciate hearing from you in
reference to this offer.
Your cooperation and anticipated prompt attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
CS 1 Group Legal Office Co.
Director
Office of the Legal Affairs of FINAL NOTICE
Secretariat-general of Interpol
AR#1A 000 186 5231 4
Re: Final demand regarding the Liabilities and Responsibilities of the Office of Legal Affairs
of Secretariat-general of Interpol
Dear Sir :
This letter is written in response to your clear inaction, which, considering the circumstances surrounding this incident, the
damage to Marc Campus’s reputation and the damage to Marc Campus’s business activities, and, is still inexcusable. We
respectfully reject your explanation that Interpol’s General Secretariat cannot be responsible for information recorded in
national databases or for information already deleted from Interpol’s databases. We stress Interpol’s General Secretariat
responsibility for information processed between Interpol’s members inside of the organization’s structure and request that
you tender an advance partial payment to start the repair process.
As you know, Marc Campus was cleared of all charges on appeal in 1985. And still the inaccurate information was
disclosed to outside agencies in 1991, 1996, 1998 and 2006. This information was forwarded initially from your
organization network 6 years after the case was dismissed. As a direct result of this false disclosure, Marc Campus had
new business agreements destroyed which cost him and his companies millions of dollars in loss.
Since then, Marc has repeatedly requested that this information be corrected through several documented telephone calls
and correspondence with your organization. Marc has been repeatedly told by your office that it is someone else’s fault.
However, in 2006, Marc was told by a legal US adviser at the USNCB that it is up to Interpol France to disclose proper
information.
Apparently, Interpol would prefer to dispute Marc’s claims and damages in front of a United States jury, while trying to
explain why your office should not be held accountable. We welcome this opportunity. We are confident that we will not only
obtain an enormous verdict, but we will have a jury verdict for a generous amount of punitive damages as well.
In view of the clear liability, the nature of the damages sustained by Marc Campus, the damages he received to his
reputation, the huge damages he received from failed business endeavors and the suffering he continues to experience
today due to the unnecessary delay in getting this matter resolved, we are confident that after reviewing all of the evidence
submitted, Marc would receive judgment in excess of any monetary amount you may offer now.
I would like to point out to you that your organization actions of reporting blatantly wrong information through official
channels from Interpol France to USNCB, to other NCB’s and from there to other governmental agencies around the world
6 years after the case was dismissed not only impinges on Marc’s personal freedom but is fraudulent and slanderous as
well. Interpol’s General Secretariat is clearly liable for the defamatory information that was processed between Interpol
members through the Interpol network. Interpol’s General Secretariat is liable for the defamatory information reported when
it was ordered to delete the conviction from its files and provide all other governmental entities the accurate information.
And, Interpol’s General Secretariat is liable for the unnecessary procrastination in getting this matter resolved.
Furthermore, it is further my opinion that if you refuse to take immediate action to complete the necessary steps to insure
the inaccurate information is deleted from USNCB, from all NCB’s and from other law agencies around the world and make
an advance partial payment to start the repair process, but rather expose other law agencies to liability as well, you will have
again breached your duty of good faith to Marc Campus and other governmental agencies for failure to mitigate damages
and correct your own wrongs immediately when given the opportunity to do so.
We will hold this opportunity open until September 15, 2007. If no action is taken by said date, it will be withdrawn and we
will file a lawsuit in the United States Federal Court and will proceed into litigation. I would appreciate hearing from you in
reference to this offer.
Your cooperation and anticipated prompt attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
CS 1 Group Legal Office Co.
Director
