| Click on any Page to ENLARGE Original and/or Find Text version Below |
| Index 1 |
| Previous |
| Next |
|
|
| Page 1/2 |
| Page 2/2 |
| Copyright © 2009-2013, MARC CAMPUS |
Sent By Fax & cert. mail # RK 22 245 640 7 FR
September 25, 2007
U.S. Department of Justice,
INTERPOL-U.S. National Central Bureau
Attn: Martin Renkiewicz, Director
Washington, DC 20530
RE: Final Notice information checking failure
Dear Mr. Renkiewicz:
Please allow this letter to serve as our final notice of request that this matter be disposed of efficiently.
Since my last request for full disclosure, additional facts have taken place. First, after your initial letter
dated September 5, 2006, a response letter was faxed on September 20, 2006 regarding both a release
of information and a status of the case currently at issue. As a member of the United Nations and
INTERPOL’s National Central Bureau, a complete investigation is not only warranted but also necessary.
Your failure to do so constituted a breach of duty and care.
The facts giving rise to our current cause of action alleges that USNCB’s actions fall well below the
standards of care and duty from its own organization. INTERPOL Rule, Article 5, clearly dictates that
National Central Bureaus (NCB’s) are to take any appropriate steps to ensure the accuracy and
relevance of the information and inform the General Secretariat of any change or deletion that needs to
be carried out. Furthermore, prior to the use of any information obtained through the ICPO-Interpol
information system, the NCBs (and other authorized entities) must check with the General Secretariat and
the source of the information to ensure that the information is still accurate and relevant. Although this
information has been updated, large amounts of time has been lost. Since our September 20, 2006
letter, our company has lost valuable time, in the form of 10 months waiting for the errors to be corrected.
Time is always of the essence when dealing with one’s personal information. Furthermore,
because of USNCB’s blatant disregard for Marc’s civil rights and due to the unnecessary length of time it
took to obtain legitimate access to personal information and resolve this matter, Marc continues to
experience business obstacles. Because of your actions, or the lack thereof, we are requesting that your
office pays an advance partial payment. This will show good faith on your part thereby beginning the
repair process without more unnecessary delay. This will also allow Marc Campus and CS 1 GROUP
LEGAL OFFICE Co. to efficiently protect their new business interests.
On August 23, 2007, a final Notice was addressed to IPSG. On September 22, 2007, a final Notice was
sent to IP France related to its Interpol Rules violation and its basic Police Ethic violation to provide false
information on Processing Information for the Purposes of International Police Cooperation. This letter
serves as our final notice of your wrong conduct when, on September 20, 2006, you refused to take
immediate action to follow Interpol rules to update your file when you were aware of the potential errors
they might contain. Because it is our contention that your negligent acts were intentional and without
mistake, Marc Campus and his associated businesses assert an entitlement to punitive damages due to
the INTERPOL organization’s gross, willful and wanton conduct. Furthermore, in order to prove a claim for
breach of fiduciary duty, it is the plaintiff's burden to demonstrate that he or she has incurred damages
and that the defendant's breach of fiduciary duty was a cause of the damages sustained. Both our
company and Marc Campus have experienced damages in the form of damages to business reputation
(also known as good will) and lost time; time that could have been utilized to further our business ventures
without the unnecessary distraction caused by your organization’s failure to timely delete false
information. Moreover, this deletion could have and should have occurred once you were aware of the
facts. However, you failed to do so causing damages that will be proven in the event of litigation.
This denial of a property right in the form of personal information is a denial of justice. In essence,
justice delayed is justice denied. I am requesting that this matter be resolved efficiently and
professionally. Further, I am requesting that all initial false information be immediately deleted.
Also, we request excuses acknowledgement for the events that took place within INTERPOL
Structure through the ICPO-Interpol information system.
We will hold this opportunity open until October 15, 2007. If this matter is not resolved expeditiously, we
will promptly pursue this matter via litigation by filing a lawsuit against the USNCB, the Interpol Secretariat
General, Mr. Noble, Mr. Martha and IP France in United States Federal Court.
I hope that this matter can be resolved without any more unnecessary delay.
Sincerely,
CS 1 GROUP LEGAL OFFICE Co.
Director
September 25, 2007
U.S. Department of Justice,
INTERPOL-U.S. National Central Bureau
Attn: Martin Renkiewicz, Director
Washington, DC 20530
RE: Final Notice information checking failure
Dear Mr. Renkiewicz:
Please allow this letter to serve as our final notice of request that this matter be disposed of efficiently.
Since my last request for full disclosure, additional facts have taken place. First, after your initial letter
dated September 5, 2006, a response letter was faxed on September 20, 2006 regarding both a release
of information and a status of the case currently at issue. As a member of the United Nations and
INTERPOL’s National Central Bureau, a complete investigation is not only warranted but also necessary.
Your failure to do so constituted a breach of duty and care.
The facts giving rise to our current cause of action alleges that USNCB’s actions fall well below the
standards of care and duty from its own organization. INTERPOL Rule, Article 5, clearly dictates that
National Central Bureaus (NCB’s) are to take any appropriate steps to ensure the accuracy and
relevance of the information and inform the General Secretariat of any change or deletion that needs to
be carried out. Furthermore, prior to the use of any information obtained through the ICPO-Interpol
information system, the NCBs (and other authorized entities) must check with the General Secretariat and
the source of the information to ensure that the information is still accurate and relevant. Although this
information has been updated, large amounts of time has been lost. Since our September 20, 2006
letter, our company has lost valuable time, in the form of 10 months waiting for the errors to be corrected.
Time is always of the essence when dealing with one’s personal information. Furthermore,
because of USNCB’s blatant disregard for Marc’s civil rights and due to the unnecessary length of time it
took to obtain legitimate access to personal information and resolve this matter, Marc continues to
experience business obstacles. Because of your actions, or the lack thereof, we are requesting that your
office pays an advance partial payment. This will show good faith on your part thereby beginning the
repair process without more unnecessary delay. This will also allow Marc Campus and CS 1 GROUP
LEGAL OFFICE Co. to efficiently protect their new business interests.
On August 23, 2007, a final Notice was addressed to IPSG. On September 22, 2007, a final Notice was
sent to IP France related to its Interpol Rules violation and its basic Police Ethic violation to provide false
information on Processing Information for the Purposes of International Police Cooperation. This letter
serves as our final notice of your wrong conduct when, on September 20, 2006, you refused to take
immediate action to follow Interpol rules to update your file when you were aware of the potential errors
they might contain. Because it is our contention that your negligent acts were intentional and without
mistake, Marc Campus and his associated businesses assert an entitlement to punitive damages due to
the INTERPOL organization’s gross, willful and wanton conduct. Furthermore, in order to prove a claim for
breach of fiduciary duty, it is the plaintiff's burden to demonstrate that he or she has incurred damages
and that the defendant's breach of fiduciary duty was a cause of the damages sustained. Both our
company and Marc Campus have experienced damages in the form of damages to business reputation
(also known as good will) and lost time; time that could have been utilized to further our business ventures
without the unnecessary distraction caused by your organization’s failure to timely delete false
information. Moreover, this deletion could have and should have occurred once you were aware of the
facts. However, you failed to do so causing damages that will be proven in the event of litigation.
This denial of a property right in the form of personal information is a denial of justice. In essence,
justice delayed is justice denied. I am requesting that this matter be resolved efficiently and
professionally. Further, I am requesting that all initial false information be immediately deleted.
Also, we request excuses acknowledgement for the events that took place within INTERPOL
Structure through the ICPO-Interpol information system.
We will hold this opportunity open until October 15, 2007. If this matter is not resolved expeditiously, we
will promptly pursue this matter via litigation by filing a lawsuit against the USNCB, the Interpol Secretariat
General, Mr. Noble, Mr. Martha and IP France in United States Federal Court.
I hope that this matter can be resolved without any more unnecessary delay.
Sincerely,
CS 1 GROUP LEGAL OFFICE Co.
Director
