| Final Notice to Mr. Duchan Oct 30, 2007 |
| Index |
| Previous |
| Next |
|
|
|
| Page 3/3 |
| Page 1/3 |
| Page 2/3 |
| Click on any Page to ENLARGE Originals and/or Find Text version Below |
| Copyright © 2009-2013, Marc CAMPUS |
Sent By Fax & cert. mail
RA: 1A 003 871 6340 4
October 30, 2007
Mr. Duchan FINAL NOTICE
Office Notariale
11230 CHALABRE
Re: Final demand regarding the Liabilities and Responsibilities of Mr. Duchan, Mr. Duchan’s
Office Clerk and Other Parties employed at Mr. Duchan’s Office
Dear Mr. Duchan:
This letter is written in response to you and your staff’s clear inaction, which, considering the
circumstances surrounding this incident, the loss of opportunity of Texas Riding Line Company
(“TRL Co.”), of its subsidiaries and the companies associated to the same CS 1 GROUP™, closely
interacting to one another, to get millions of dollars, and, is still inexcusable. The damage you created
initially due to the invalid will, fraud, misrepresentation and the ongoing current damage you are still
building due to time lost to resolve your negligence and fraud have caused our claim against you to grow
even further.
In a final attempt, we are now demanding that you and your office staff (1) provide a copy of your
professional insurance policy, (2) pay an advance partial payment to start the repair process without
additional delay and (3) take immediate action to complete the necessary steps before the Chamber of
Notaries for your fraud to insure that we receive compensation for the lost incomings and loss of rights. If
you fail to do either of the above requests and fail to depart from your current position, we will initiate a
lawsuit in the United States Federal Court naming you and your clerk and your office as defendants and
ask for the maximum award allowed by law.
As you already know, on February 2, 2004, Irene Maquard employed you to establish her will in
authentic/notarial form. Ms. Maquard wished to comply with all the legal requirements to make sure her will
was valid. You failed to check the nationality of the witnesses and you failed to read the act in its entirety
before the witnesses. Furthermore, when you returned to your office, your clerk (whose job duties
consisted of following the file, preparing the necessary paperwork and verifying that everything was in
order) failed to check and/or point out the legal breach in order to correct the situation while there was still
time. Ms. Maquard died February 13, 2004.
Additionally, after you realized you had committed malpractice due to your failure to execute your
duty with diligence and prudence, you decided to move your actions into fraudulent behavior
when you requested the Apostille to be used for all legal need/process in USA, on April 22, 2004
from the Acte de Notoriete to the Appeal Court and again on May 13, 2004 when you requested the
Apositlle from will registration to the Appeal Court to be used also for all legal need/process in USA. You
were aware that Ms. Maquard’s will was no longer valid when you requested both Apostilles. Not only did
you breach you duties to Ms. Maquard and her beneficiaries, but you engaged in fraud to
cover up your negligence in your position as a public officer. As such, you have committed a fraud
against Ms. Maquard, TRLco as well as Marc Campus (Owner and Director of TRLco.) and TRLco.
Associated businesses, against the international community and finally against the United States
government: The international community relied on and depends upon the notary to insure that those
persons executing official documents are accurately identified, to refuse to certify any identification that is
false or uncertain, and to insist that oaths are properly and accurately administered. Moreover, courts
recognize that property succession, especially when a will is involved, depend upon the care and integrity
of the notary to verify the authenticity of the execution of documents and individuals. The international
treaty of the Hague convention was not designed to ease fraudulent behavior of Public officer
but to help international community to legally trade easily.
Furthermore, Ms. Maquard’s will mentioned, among others, that she wanted justice for the wrongs
committed against herself and Marc Campus involving false information transmitted by French
Government in 1991 to several Law enforcement agencies in USA, where she resided at the time and
around the world, which hurt Ms. Maquard and Marc’s business arrangements. We have been notified as
of August 29, 2007, that Interpol USA (“USNCB”) acknowledged misinformation still contained by its file
were supplied by French Government through reference Number DCPJ/AC/5APB/BCN NR 5188/GRI/NR
5710/DP/BM/91/5751 and that USNCB received a response from Interpol France confirming the duty and
need to correct its file accordingly and that USNCB has finally corrected their database. The
misinformation case hurt additionally Ms. Maquard and the will nullity prevents our office from
making a claim on her behalf thus causing further spoliations and damages.
We have repeatedly requested your assistance in helping us recover the loss of rights we would have
enjoyed. However, you have chosen to stop speaking to us and to ignore the fact that your insurance
company dragged the issue in bad faith and rejected our claim. You could have gone to the Chamber
of Notaries to help repair the harm done to us in order to make amends for your international
law violation / Apostille’s fraud and to show your good faith as a public officer in acordance to
the collective guaranty’s provision of your organization. Your negligent and unethical acts caused
us a considerable amount of harm and we cannot understand why you have not taken the necessary
steps to repair the harms that you created.
Apparently, you and your office personnel would prefer to dispute our claims and damages in front of a
United States jury. We welcome this opportunity. We are confident that we will not only obtain an
enormous verdict, but we will have a jury verdict for a generous amount of punitive damages for
your fraudulent behavior as well.
In view of the clear liability, the nature of the damages sustained by TRL Co., the damages sustained by
Ms. Maquard’s last wills, the huge damages we continue to experience today due to the unnecessary
delay in getting this matter resolved, we are confident that after reviewing all of the evidence submitted,
we would receive judgment in excess of any monetary amount you may offer now.
I would like to point out to you that French notaires have the obligation to make sure that the juridical acts
are effective. Specifically, the notaire has the obligation to verify the quality of the parties concerned by
the document. This security depends on various checks, in particular the verification of the capacity of
each involved party. Your inaction to perform your duties has caused Ms. Maquard’s will to be declared
invalid. The French Supreme Court of Appeal declared that the legal professional, bound by a duty of
advice, had to prove he did fulfill his obligation. Thus, even though we could easily prove the elements of
your fault, the burden shifts to you and your office staff to prove that you did nothing wrong and Ms.
Maquard’s will is a valid will. Because you are unable to prove that you fulfilled your obligation,
you are required to repair the lost incomings and particularly the loss of rights the plaintiff
should have enjoyed. Except, you have failed to meet the responsibilities that state you and
your staff are required to repair the loss immediately, causing more unnecessary delay.
Furthermore, it is further my opinion that if you refuse to take immediate action to complete the necessary
steps before the Chamber of Notaries for your fraud to insure that we receive compensation for the lost
incomings and loss of rights and make an advance partial payment to start the repair process, but rather
expose us to further damages as well, you will have again breached your duty of good faith for failure to
mitigate damages and correct your own wrongs immediately when given the opportunity to do so.
We will hold this opportunity open until November 21, 2007. If no action is taken by said date, it will be
withdrawn and we will file a lawsuit in the United States Federal Court and will proceed into litigation. I
would appreciate hearing from you in reference to this offer. Please have your response sent to Marc
Campus and CS 1 Group Legal Office Co., Wilmington, DE 19801 USA.
Your cooperation and anticipated prompt attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
CS 1 Group Legal Office Co.
RA: 1A 003 871 6340 4
October 30, 2007
Mr. Duchan FINAL NOTICE
Office Notariale
11230 CHALABRE
Re: Final demand regarding the Liabilities and Responsibilities of Mr. Duchan, Mr. Duchan’s
Office Clerk and Other Parties employed at Mr. Duchan’s Office
Dear Mr. Duchan:
This letter is written in response to you and your staff’s clear inaction, which, considering the
circumstances surrounding this incident, the loss of opportunity of Texas Riding Line Company
(“TRL Co.”), of its subsidiaries and the companies associated to the same CS 1 GROUP™, closely
interacting to one another, to get millions of dollars, and, is still inexcusable. The damage you created
initially due to the invalid will, fraud, misrepresentation and the ongoing current damage you are still
building due to time lost to resolve your negligence and fraud have caused our claim against you to grow
even further.
In a final attempt, we are now demanding that you and your office staff (1) provide a copy of your
professional insurance policy, (2) pay an advance partial payment to start the repair process without
additional delay and (3) take immediate action to complete the necessary steps before the Chamber of
Notaries for your fraud to insure that we receive compensation for the lost incomings and loss of rights. If
you fail to do either of the above requests and fail to depart from your current position, we will initiate a
lawsuit in the United States Federal Court naming you and your clerk and your office as defendants and
ask for the maximum award allowed by law.
As you already know, on February 2, 2004, Irene Maquard employed you to establish her will in
authentic/notarial form. Ms. Maquard wished to comply with all the legal requirements to make sure her will
was valid. You failed to check the nationality of the witnesses and you failed to read the act in its entirety
before the witnesses. Furthermore, when you returned to your office, your clerk (whose job duties
consisted of following the file, preparing the necessary paperwork and verifying that everything was in
order) failed to check and/or point out the legal breach in order to correct the situation while there was still
time. Ms. Maquard died February 13, 2004.
Additionally, after you realized you had committed malpractice due to your failure to execute your
duty with diligence and prudence, you decided to move your actions into fraudulent behavior
when you requested the Apostille to be used for all legal need/process in USA, on April 22, 2004
from the Acte de Notoriete to the Appeal Court and again on May 13, 2004 when you requested the
Apositlle from will registration to the Appeal Court to be used also for all legal need/process in USA. You
were aware that Ms. Maquard’s will was no longer valid when you requested both Apostilles. Not only did
you breach you duties to Ms. Maquard and her beneficiaries, but you engaged in fraud to
cover up your negligence in your position as a public officer. As such, you have committed a fraud
against Ms. Maquard, TRLco as well as Marc Campus (Owner and Director of TRLco.) and TRLco.
Associated businesses, against the international community and finally against the United States
government: The international community relied on and depends upon the notary to insure that those
persons executing official documents are accurately identified, to refuse to certify any identification that is
false or uncertain, and to insist that oaths are properly and accurately administered. Moreover, courts
recognize that property succession, especially when a will is involved, depend upon the care and integrity
of the notary to verify the authenticity of the execution of documents and individuals. The international
treaty of the Hague convention was not designed to ease fraudulent behavior of Public officer
but to help international community to legally trade easily.
Furthermore, Ms. Maquard’s will mentioned, among others, that she wanted justice for the wrongs
committed against herself and Marc Campus involving false information transmitted by French
Government in 1991 to several Law enforcement agencies in USA, where she resided at the time and
around the world, which hurt Ms. Maquard and Marc’s business arrangements. We have been notified as
of August 29, 2007, that Interpol USA (“USNCB”) acknowledged misinformation still contained by its file
were supplied by French Government through reference Number DCPJ/AC/5APB/BCN NR 5188/GRI/NR
5710/DP/BM/91/5751 and that USNCB received a response from Interpol France confirming the duty and
need to correct its file accordingly and that USNCB has finally corrected their database. The
misinformation case hurt additionally Ms. Maquard and the will nullity prevents our office from
making a claim on her behalf thus causing further spoliations and damages.
We have repeatedly requested your assistance in helping us recover the loss of rights we would have
enjoyed. However, you have chosen to stop speaking to us and to ignore the fact that your insurance
company dragged the issue in bad faith and rejected our claim. You could have gone to the Chamber
of Notaries to help repair the harm done to us in order to make amends for your international
law violation / Apostille’s fraud and to show your good faith as a public officer in acordance to
the collective guaranty’s provision of your organization. Your negligent and unethical acts caused
us a considerable amount of harm and we cannot understand why you have not taken the necessary
steps to repair the harms that you created.
Apparently, you and your office personnel would prefer to dispute our claims and damages in front of a
United States jury. We welcome this opportunity. We are confident that we will not only obtain an
enormous verdict, but we will have a jury verdict for a generous amount of punitive damages for
your fraudulent behavior as well.
In view of the clear liability, the nature of the damages sustained by TRL Co., the damages sustained by
Ms. Maquard’s last wills, the huge damages we continue to experience today due to the unnecessary
delay in getting this matter resolved, we are confident that after reviewing all of the evidence submitted,
we would receive judgment in excess of any monetary amount you may offer now.
I would like to point out to you that French notaires have the obligation to make sure that the juridical acts
are effective. Specifically, the notaire has the obligation to verify the quality of the parties concerned by
the document. This security depends on various checks, in particular the verification of the capacity of
each involved party. Your inaction to perform your duties has caused Ms. Maquard’s will to be declared
invalid. The French Supreme Court of Appeal declared that the legal professional, bound by a duty of
advice, had to prove he did fulfill his obligation. Thus, even though we could easily prove the elements of
your fault, the burden shifts to you and your office staff to prove that you did nothing wrong and Ms.
Maquard’s will is a valid will. Because you are unable to prove that you fulfilled your obligation,
you are required to repair the lost incomings and particularly the loss of rights the plaintiff
should have enjoyed. Except, you have failed to meet the responsibilities that state you and
your staff are required to repair the loss immediately, causing more unnecessary delay.
Furthermore, it is further my opinion that if you refuse to take immediate action to complete the necessary
steps before the Chamber of Notaries for your fraud to insure that we receive compensation for the lost
incomings and loss of rights and make an advance partial payment to start the repair process, but rather
expose us to further damages as well, you will have again breached your duty of good faith for failure to
mitigate damages and correct your own wrongs immediately when given the opportunity to do so.
We will hold this opportunity open until November 21, 2007. If no action is taken by said date, it will be
withdrawn and we will file a lawsuit in the United States Federal Court and will proceed into litigation. I
would appreciate hearing from you in reference to this offer. Please have your response sent to Marc
Campus and CS 1 Group Legal Office Co., Wilmington, DE 19801 USA.
Your cooperation and anticipated prompt attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
CS 1 Group Legal Office Co.
